PDA

View Full Version : Harry Hoxsey: Jailed For Curing Cancer


SchoolOfRAWk
07-27-2007, 06:29 PM
Hoxsey's Herbs Heal Cancers
Red Clover, Burdock Root, others offer track record of success: AMA, NCI, FDA Suppressed Treatment
By Richard Walters
Copyright© 1994 Well Being Journal.


FOR OVER THREE DECADES, Harry Hoxsey (1901-1974), a self taught healer, cured many cancer patients using an herbal remedy reportedly handed down by his great-grandfather. By the 1950's, the Hoxsey Cancer Clinic in Dallas was the world's largest private cancer center, with branches in seventeen states. Born in Illinois, the charismatic practitioner of herbal folk medicine faced unrelenting opposition and harassment from a hostile medical establishment. Nevertheless, two federal courts upheld the "therapeutic value" of Hoxsey's internal tonic. Even his archenemies, the American Medical Association and the Food and Drug Administration, admitted that his treatment could cure some forms of cancer. A Dallas judge ruled in federal court that Hoxsey's therapy was "comparable to surgery, radium, and x-ray" in its effectiveness, without the destructive side effects of those treatments.

But in the 1950's, at the tail end of the McCarthy era, Hoxsey's clinics were shut down. The AMA, NCI, and FDA organized a "conspiracy" to "suppress" a fair, unbiased assessment of Hoxsey's methods, according to a 1953 federal report to Congress. Hoxsey's Dallas clinic closed its doors in 1960, and three years later, at Hoxsey's request, Mildred Nelson R.N., his long time chief nurse, moved the operation to Tijuana, Mexico.

The Bio-Medical Center, as the clinic is now called, treats all types of cancer. Nelson oversees a staff of fully licensed medical doctors and support personnel. The records indicate that many patients, some arriving with late stages of the disease, have been helped and even completely healed of cancer by the non-toxic Hoxsey therapy, which today combines internal and external herbal preparations with a diet, vitamin and mineral supplements, and attitudinal counseling.

The medical orthodoxy labeled Harry Hoxsey "the worst cancer quack of the century." His herbal medicine was denigrated as worthless, simply "a bottle of colored water" containing extracts of useless backyard weeds. FDA officials would go to patients' houses, intimidate them, tell them they were being duped by a quack, and take away their Hoxsey medicines. The American Cancer Society added the Hoxsey therapy to its blacklist of Unproven Methods in 1968, using its customary phraseology about the lack of any evidence that the treatment works.

Yet no representative of the ACS has ever visited the Bio-Medical Center or scientifically tested the Hoxsey remedies. Hoxsey repeatedly urged the AMA and NCI to conduct a scientific investigation of his formulas, but his pleas went unanswered. Instead, his practice was outlawed, the FDA banning the sale of all Hoxsey medications in 1960. His therapy was driven out of the country by a closed minded medical fraternity that continues to view inexpensive, non-toxic herbal medicine as a direct competitive threat.

Today we know that Hoxsey's plant based remedies contain naturally occurring compounds with potent anti-cancer effects. According to eminent botanist James Duke Ph.D., of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, all of the Hoxsey herbs have known anti-cancer properties. All of them are cited in Plants Used Against Cancer, a global compendium of folk usage of medicinal plants compiled by NCI chemist Jonathan Hartwell. Furthermore, Duke noted, the Hoxsey herbs have long been used by Native American healers to treat cancer, and traveling European doctors picked up the knowledge and took it home with them to treat patients.

Hoxsey treated external cancers with a red paste made of bloodroot (Sanguinaria canadensis)-a common wildflower-mixed with zinc chloride and antimony sulfide. The root stock of blood-root, a spring-blooming flower, contains an alkaloid, sanguinarine, that has powerful anti-tumor properties. North American Indians living along the shores of Lake Superior used the red sap from bloodroot to treat cancer. Drawing on Indian lore, Dr. J.W. Fell, working at the Middlesex Hospital in London in the 1850's, developed a paste made of bloodroot extract, zinc chloride, flour and water. Applied directly to a malignant growth, Dr. Fell's paste generally destroyed it within two to four weeks. In the 1960's, various teams of doctors reported the complete healing of cancers of the nose, external ear, and other organs using a paste made of bloodroot and zinc chloride, a mixture virtually identical to Hoxsey's.

The AMA condemned Hoxsey's "caustic pastes" as fraudulent in 1949, even though a prominent Wisconsin surgeon, Dr. Frederick Mohs, in 1941 had used a red paste identical to Hoxsey's to fix cancerous tissue that he surgically removed under complete micro-scopic control.

Medical historian Patrician Spain Ward reported "provocative findings of anti-tumor properties" in many of the individual Hoxsey herbs when she investigated the Hoxsey regimen in 1988 for the U.S. Congress's Office of Technology Assessment. The basic ingredients of Hoxsey's internal tonic are such substances as licorice, red clover, burdock root, stillingia root, berberis root, poke root, cascara, prickly ash bark, and buckthorn bark. Ward noted that "orthodox scientific research has by now identified anti-tumor activity" in most of Hoxsey's plants.

For example, two Hungarian scientists in 1966 reported "considerable anti-tumor activity" in a purified fraction of burdock. Japanese researchers at Nagoya University in 1984 found in burdock a new type of desmutagen, a substance that is uniquely capable of reducing mutation in either the absence or the presence of metabolic activation. This new property is so important, the Japanese scientists named it the B-factor for "burdock factor."

Hoxsey himself believed that his therapy normalized and balanced the chemistry within the body. Like many other holistic healers, he considered cancer to be a systematic disease, not a localized one. Cancer he wrote "occurs only in the presence of a profound physiological change in the constituents of body fluids and a consequent chemical imbalance in the organism." His herbal medicines are intended to restore the original chemical balance to the body's disturbed metabolism, creating an environment unfavorable to cancer cells, which cease to multiply and eventually die. The herbal remedy is said to strengthen the immune system and to help carry away wastes and toxins from the tumors that the herbal compound caused to necrotize. While this theory may be inexact, current research seems to be vindicating Hoxsey, or at least showing that his method merits a thorough, unbiased investigation by the medical orthodoxy.

Mildred Nelson was first introduced to the Hoxsey approach in 1946 when her mother, Della Mae Nelson, underwent the Hoxsey therapy for cancer. Mildred, a conventionally trained nurse from Jacksboro, TX., believed Hoxsey was a quack, so she went to Dallas to try to talk Della Mae out of her foolishness. Instead, she ended up taking a job at Hoxsey's clinic as a nurse. Her mother recovered and is alive and well today. Mildred's father was also treated by Hoxsey for a recurrence of cancer in the eye socket, having had one cancerous eye removed earlier. He became cancer-free and remained so until his death in 1957 from meningitis.

According to Hoxsey's autobiography, You Don't Have to Die (see Resources), his family's healing saga began in 1840 when Illinois horse breeder John Hoxsey, his great-grandfather, watched a favorite stallion recover from a cancerous lesion on his leg. The horse, put out to pasture to die, grazed on one particular clump of shrubs and flowering plants and healed itself. John Hoxsey picked samples of these plants, experimented with them, and formulated an herbal liquid, a salve, and a powder. He used these medications to treat cancer, fiscula, and sores in horses that breeders brought from as far away as Indiana and Kentucky. The herbal formulas were handed down within the family, and Harry's father, John, a veterinary surgeon, began quietly treating human cancer patients. From the age of eight, Harry served as his father's trusted assistant. After years on the road as an itinerant healer, he opened his first Hoxsey Cancer Clinic in Dallas in 1924.

Thus began a protracted battle pitting Harry Hoxsey, an ex-coal miner and Texas oilman whose family traced its lineage to Plymouth Colony, against the American medical establishment. Hoxsey was arrested more times than any person in medical history, usually for practicing medicine without a license. But no cancer patient ever testified against him. On the contrary, his patients would gather at the jail in a show of support, hastening his release. Senators, judges, and some doctors endorsed his anticancer treatment. Although the flamboyant healer fit the stereotyped image of a quack, legions of supporters, once gravely ill with cancer, said they owed their lives and continued well-being to him.

Finally, in 1954, an independent team of ten physicians from around the United States made a two-day inspection of Hoxsey's Dallas clinic and issued a remarkable statement. After examining hundreds of case histories and interviewing patients and ex-patients, the doctors released a signed report declaring that the clinic......."is successfully treating pathologically proven cases of cancer, both internal and external, without the use of surgery, radium or x-ray.

Accepting the standard yardstick of cases that have remained symptom-free in excess of five to six years after treatment, established by medical authorities, we have seen sufficient cases to warrant such a conclusion. Some of those presented before us have been free of symptoms as long as twenty-four years, and the physical evidence indicates that they are all enjoying exceptional health at this time.

We as a Committee feel that the Hoxsey treatment is superior to such conventional methods of treatment as x-ray, radium or surgery. We are willing to assist this Clinic in any way possible in bringing this treatment to the American public."

But the treatment was denied to the American public. In 1924, according to Hoxsey's autobiography, Dr. Malcolm Harris, an eminent Chicago surgeon and later president of the AMA, had offered to buy out the Hoxsey anticancer tonic after watching Hoxsey successfully treat a terminal cancer patient. Hoxsey would get 10 percent of the profits, according to the offer, but only after ten years. The AMA would set the fees, keep all the profits for the first nine years, the reap 90 percent of the profits from the tenth year on. The alleged offer would have given all control to a group of doctors including AMA boss Dr. Morris Fishbein.

Hoxsey refused the offer, or so he claims. The AMA denies that any such incident ever occurred. In any event, two things are certain: The "terminal" cancer patient, police sergeant Thomas Mannix, fully recovered and lived another decade. And Morris Fishbein became a powerful, relentless enemy of Harry Hoxsey.

Another opponent was assistant District Attorney Al Templeton, who arrested Hoxsey more than 100 times in Dallas over a two year period. Then, in 1939, Templeton's younger brother Mike, developed cancer. He had a colostomy, but the cancer continued to spread; his doctors told him nothing more could be done for him. When Mike secretly went to Hoxsey and was cured, Al Templeton had a change of heart. The once-hostile prosecutor became Hoxsey's lawyer.

Esquire magazine sent reporter James Burke to Texas in 1939 with the aim of doing an expose that would discredit Hoxsey as a worthless, dangerous quack. Burke stayed six weeks, became a strong supporter of Hoxsey and later his publicist, and filed a story entitled "The Quack Who Cures Cancer." Esquire never published it.

In 1949, Morris Fishbein, long time editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), wrote an attack on Hoxsey that was published in the Hearst papers' Sunday magazine supplement, read by 20 million people. In the piece, entitled "Blood Money," Fishbein, the influential "voice of American medicine," portrayed Hoxsey as a malevolent charlatan and repeated many of the unsubstantiated charges that he had been printing for years in JAMA.

Hoxsey sued Fishbein and the Hearst newspaper empire for libel and slander. It seemed a hopeless David-versus-Goliath contest, but Hoxsey won. Although his monetary award was just $2.00, he achieved a stunning moral victory. Fifty of his patients testified on his behalf. The judge found Fishbein's statements to be "false, slanderous and libelous." And Fishbein made astonishing admissions during the trial, such as that he had failed anatomy in medical school and had never treated a patient or practiced a day of medicine in his entire career. Even more shocking, Dr. Fishbein admitted in court that Hoxsey's supposedly "brutal" pastes actually did cure external cancer.

The leader of America's "quack attack" was now on the defensive. Critics charged the AMA with being a doctor's trade union, setting national medical policy to further its own selfish interests. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed: the AMA had conspired in restraint of trade. Dr Fishbein was forced to resign.

In 1958, the Fitzgerald Report, commissioned by a United States Senate committee, concluded that organized medicine had "conspired" to suppress the Hoxsey therapy and at least a dozen other promising cancer treatments. The proponents of these unconventional methods were mostly respected doctors and scientists who had developed nutritional or immunological approaches. Panels of surgeons and radiation therapists had dismissed the therapies as quackery, and these promising treatments were banned without a serious investigation. They all remain to this day on the American Cancer Society's blacklist of "Unproven Methods of Cancer Management."

By this time, the Hoxsey clinic in Dallas had 12,000 patients and Harry Hoxsey was contemplating running for governor of Texas, a post that would enable him to appoint the state medical board and thereby get an impartial investigation into his therapy. Hordes of Hoxsey's patients flooded Washington, D.C., demanding medical freedom of choice. Hoxsey threatened to picket the White House with 25,000 cured patients. But the FDA and other federal agencies mounted a massive legal and paralegal assault. A therapy with the potential to help cure cancer sufferers was hounded out of the country.

When Mildred Nelson moved the clinic to Mexico in 1963, Hoxsey stayed in Dallas in the oil business. In 1967, he developed prostate cancer. He took his own tonic, but ironically, it didn't work for him. Although surgery is fairly routine for prostate cancer, he refused to have it, fearing that the Dallas doctors would take their revenge on him on the operating table. Hoxsey spent his last seven years as an invalid, dying in isolation, nearly forgotten. He was buried around Christmas in 1974, without an obituary or tribute in the Dallas newspapers.

The Bio-Medical Center in Tijuana, a glass-walled mansion within the sight of the United States-Mexico border, is an outpatient clinic only. Patients who arrive before 9:00 a.m. are seen without an appointment. They are given a complete physical examination, lab tests, and x-rays, and have their clinical history taken. Patients are advised to bring existing medical records from other hospitals and facilities. After their appointment, which usually lasts one full day, sometimes longer, patients return home with enough Hoxsey medication and supplements to last several months. They are encouraged to make a follow-up visit after three to six months.

The herbal tonics, salves, and powders given are adjusted to suit the specific needs of each patient, taking into account his or her general health, the location and severity of the cancer, and the extent of previous treatments for it. The Hoxsey therapy is reportedly effective in alleviating pain in many cases.

Dietary specifications include the total avoidance of pork, vinegar, tomatoes, carbonated drinks, and alcohol. The forbidden foods are thought to work against the therapeutic action of the medicine. Patients are also told not to consume bleached flour or refined sugar and to ingest very limited amounts of salt. Supplements include immune stimulants, yeast tablets, vitamin C, calcium capsules, laxative tablets, and antiseptic washes. Patients are counseled to adopt a positive mental outlook and to assume complete responsibility for their own health. The clinic also offers chelation, immunotherapy, and homeopathy, as well as chemotherapy in extremely serious, life threatening cases.

The types of cancer said to respond best to the treatment include lymphoma, melanoma, and external skin cancer. The clinic's patient brochure includes case histories of patients successfully treated for breast, cervical, prostate, colon and lung cancers.

In 1965, Margaret Griffin of Pittsburgh was given one year to live by her conventional doctors. She had been having blackouts, and x-rays revealed that she had two tumors around her aorta. Exploratory surgery confirmed the existence of the tumors and also uncovered lesions in the right lung, a blockage of the superior vena cava, and metastases to the lymph glands. Thirty doses of cobalt radiation failed to arrest the growing tumors and made Margaret feel worse. As time went on, her face became puffy, she experienced difficulty breathing, and she felt that she was going steadily downhill.

Margaret decided to fly to Dallas to try the Hoxsey therapy. After visiting the clinic, she took four teaspoons per day of the herbal tonic for several months and followed the prescribed diet. She noticed no improvement, however, and was having serious doubts about the therapy's value. But after ten months on the regimen, her breathing improved, her strength returned, and she sensed a dramatic overall improvement. When she called her family doctor for a check-up, he refused to see her "because you didn't believe in my diagnoses." Subsequent x-rays taken by a different doctor indicated that the two tumors and related conditions were gone.

Margaret continued to take the Hoxsey tonic until 1979, when she went off it for a five-year period. In 1984 she had a build-up of fluid in her right lung. Surgery revealed a recurrence of the tumor blocking the superior vena cava. Margaret went back on her Hoxsey regimen, and her lung problem cleared up. X-rays taken in 1989 showed no sign of cancer, and today, more than twenty-five years after she was given a year at most to live, Margaret is alive, healthy, and active.

"Mildred Nelson is a totally dedicated healer," says Margaret. "The medical community should pay homage to her. I told Mildred that I wish we could clone her. The world needs her."

Approximately 80 percent of the patients seen at the Bio-Medical Center benefit substantially from the treatment, according to Nelson. No full-scale independent studies have ever been done to evaluate this claim, however. In an informal tracking survey, Steve Austin, a naturopath from Portland, Oregon, and five colleagues followed approximately thirty-five Hoxsey Patients. They were able to stay in touch with twenty-two of them either for five years or until death. Austin, who teaches at Western States Chiropractic College in Portland, visited the Bio-Medical Center in 1983 and asked patients walking through the doors if they would be willing to participate in his survey. He then kept in touch with them through annual letters.

Of the twenty-two patients, eleven had died by the end of the five years and eleven were still alive. Among the survivors, three said there condition was deteriorating, but eight claimed to be totally cancer-free. All eight of the cancer-free survivors had previously been diagnosed in the states by medical doctors.

Austin, who plans to publish his findings, emphasizes that his case studies should be considered very preliminary. His sample was small, and it is possible that many of the twenty-two patients were in the very late stages of cancer. Also, a number of the patients may have failed to take their medicine or to stay on the recommended diet.

"The outcome - 8 out of 22 five-year survivors - suggests that the results were better than chance, especially since one of the eight had late-stage melanoma and another had lung cancer," says Austin. "I was a skeptic about the Hoxsey program. Initially, it felt pretty hokey to me. But Mildred Nelson told me, 'Everything is open here. Go out there and talk to any of the patients. They all know somebody who has been cured by the treatment.' When I mingled with the patients and spoke to them, Mildred's statement turned out to be true, though our results certainly do not suggest a substantial benefit in 80 percent."

Mildred Nelson has said that if she cannot find a health professional whom she feels she can entrust to run the clinic and fill her shoes, the Hoxsey therapy may one day die with her. That would be a tragic end to the Hoxsey saga. Meanwhile, cancer patients who are interested in Hoxsey's methods but cannot afford the trip to Mexico can avail themselves of at least part of the regimen. Three herbal companies sell products that are apparently identical to the Hoxsey internal tonic formula, or very nearly so. The herbal capsules sold by one of the distributors reportedly requires only supplemental potassium iodide; the other two distributors products - one, a blend of herbal tinctures - are said to be virtually identical to the Hoxsey tonic formula.

It should be emphasized that none of these distributors is in any way connected with the Bio-Medical Center, and none claims that it's product is useful in treating cancer. The quality of these Hoxsey-like herbal mixtures and the results for people who use them are unknown. Furthermore, taking only the herbal component of the therapy and neglecting the other aspects of the program could weaken the overall effect. If a cancer patient wishes to pursue a Hoxsey like protocol without a trip to Mexico, it is strongly recommended that he or she do so under the direction of a qualified physician or holistic practitioner. For more information about resources for these herbal products or for practitioner referrals, contact the Center for Advancement in Cancer Education, 300 East Lancaster Ave.,Suite 100, Wynnewood, PA 19096. Phone: 215-642-4810.




Richard Walters, who is a medical and health writer and a graduate of Columbia University, lives in New York.




Acknowledgement: This article was originally printed in Options: The Alternative Cancer Therapy Book by Richard Walters: 1993, Avery Publishing Group, $13.95 paperback, 120 Old Broadway, Garden City Park, NY 11040.




FREE COPY OF OPTIONS with Hoxsey therapy and Essiac chapters: Subscribe to Well Being Journal (1-800-484-2430 ext. code 1013) for 2 years / $48 and receive a free copy of Richard Walters' Options: The Alternative Cancer Therapy Book.Subscribe Today!




Resources:

Bio-Medical Center, P.O. Box 727, 615 General Ferreira, Colonia Juarez, Tijuana, Mexico 22000 - Phone: 011 52 66 84-9011, 011 52 66-84-9081, 011 52 66 84-9376. For further information on Hoxsey therapy and details on treatment.

Reading Material:

You Don't Have to Die, by Harry Hoxsey, Milestone Books (New York), 1956. Out of print: check your local library.

The Cancer Survivors and How They Did It, by Judith Glassman.

"Does Mildred Nelson Have an Herbal Cure for Cancer?" by Peter Barry Chowka, Whole Life Times, January-February 1984.

"The Troubling Case of Harry Hoxsey," by Ken Ausubel, New Age Journal, July-August 1988.

Other Material:

Video: Hoxsey: When Healing Becomes a Crime (originally entitled Hoxsey: Quacks Who Cure Cancer?), 1987. Ninety-six minutes. An excellent, very moving documentary on the Hoxsey therapy, covering its history, the Bio-Medical Center, and the politics and economics of cancer. Produced and directed by Ken Ausubel and co-produced by Catherine Salveson, R.N., it premiered at the Margaret Mead Film Festival in New York and was shown on cable television. Available from Realidad Productions (P.O. Box 1644, Santa Fe, NM 87504; 505-989-8575).

Notes:

Ken Ausubel, "The Troubling Case of Harry Hoxsey," New Age Journal, July-Aug 1988, p.79.

Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol.114, 1962, pp. 25-30; and see Walter H. Lewis and Memory P.F. Elvin-Lewis, Medical Botany: Plants Affecting Man's Health (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1977).

F.E. Mohs, "Chemosurgery: A Microscopically Controlled Method of Cancer Excision," Archives of Surgery, vol.42, 1941, pp.279-295, cited in Patricia Spain Ward, "History of Hoxsey Treatment," contact report submitted to U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, May 1988, pp.2-3.

Ward, op. cit., p.8.

Kazuyoshi Morita, Tsuneo Kada, and Mitsuo Namiki, A Desmutagenic Factor Isolated From Burdock (Arctium Lappa Linne)," Mutation Research, vol.129, 1984, pp.25-31, cited in Ward, op. cit., p.7.

Harry Hoxsey, You Don't Have to Die (New York: Milestone Books, 1956), pp.44-48.

Ibid., p.59.

SchoolOfRAWk
07-27-2007, 06:29 PM
Harry Hoxsey: Healer Before His Time
an interview with Kenny Ausubel

In 1924, ex-coal miner, Harry Hoxsey, claimed a cure for cancer using herbal remedies inherited from his great-grandfather. Thousands of patients swore the treatment cured them but medical authorities branded Hoxsey the worst cancer quack of the century. Was Hoxsey a quack — who cured cancer? Decide for yourself with the help of this excerpt from a conversation between Kenny Ausubel and Michael Toms, on New Dimensions Radio.

Michael Toms: So Ken, tell me how you got interested in Harry Hoxsey and this whole process of curing cancer. What's the story behind that?

Kenney Ausubel: Well, I was living on a small farm north of Santa Fe, New Mexico in 1976 and I got a phone call one evening from my mom telling me, blood chillingly, that my father had cancer. And six months later he was dead; they didn't even try to treat him. Two weeks later in the mail, unbidden, I received this newsletter containing testimonials of cancer patients who said that they had actually been cured by using this nutritional and metabolical program.

I decided with my father freshly buried that if there was anything to this I really wanted to know about it. I embarked on a personal investigation. And I sort of fell through the rabbit-hole into this nether world of remarkable remissions, what Dr. Bernie Siegel calls "people who got well when they weren't supposed to." Several years into that process I came upon this very obscure article in a magazine by Peter Chowca about the story of the Hoxsey Cancer Clinics. Here was this fellow who claimed to have a treatment for cancer that really worked — these herbal formulas — and two federal courts upheld the therapeutic value of the treatment. He had senators, judges, Congressmen, even many doctors supporting him, yet he could not get organized medicine to give him a fair investigation.

Toms: Let's set the timeframe for Harry Hoxsey.

Ausubel: He was born in 1901. He was the baby of thirteen children. His father had these herbal formulas that he had inherited from his grandfather who was actually a horse farmer in Illinois around 1840.

[According to] Hoxsey legend, the great grandfather's prize stallion had a malignant tumor on its right hock. He didn't want to kill the animal, so he just put it out to pasture to die peacefully. Three weeks later he noticed that the tumor had stabilized and within three months the horse was completely well. So he started to observe this horse very closely, of course, and what he found was that it was eating all these unusual plants, not part of its normal diet, mostly roots. He went to the barn and got his mortar and pestle and started to experiment with these herbs that were discovered, quite literally, by horse-sense. He actually became very famous as a veterinarian for treating animals with tumors and cancer and then passed the formulas down through the generations.

In 1924, Harry's father died and bequeathed him the formulas on his death-bed with various charges: poor people should be treated for free, and if possible, he would like the Hoxsey name on it. He warned the boy against what he called the high priests of medicine who would fight him tooth and nail of every turn because he was taking money out of their pockets. And boy, was that prophetic.

At that time medicine was not very remunerative. In fact, the largest cause of death among doctors was suicide usually owing to poverty. But great financial empires were being built around oil, steel, and money and so forth, and several of these folks recognized that medicine was an unexcavated gold mine. So by the time Harry Hoxsey opened up his first clinic in 1924, the American Medical Association (AMA) was suddenly a formidable organization backed by very large financial interests.

Toms: So then — the allopaths literally took over.

Ausubel: They took over. There are two levels of the story: one of them is about money and about a trade war of people essentially competing for business. And the other part of it was really a difference in medical opinion. A complete difference in medical philosophies about the nature of healings and the nature of therapy.

Toms: Also, at the same time this is when the American Medical Association got created, right?

Ausubel: It was actually created in 1847 but it was an inconsequential trade association throughout the nineteenth century. It was only when these large financial forces got involved that it became powerful. What was good about it for the doctors was that they started to make more money. What was bad was they lost control over their professional integrity and essentially gave up their power to this organization that is pretty notorious for self-serving interests.

But Hoxsey didn't quite understand that. He opened up his first clinic in 1924 —

Toms: So he's jumping into this context now.

Ausubel: Yes, and he had sort of wanted to go to medical school but somebody jump-started him a little bit and convinced him that he should just open up his clinic, which he did.

Toms: Did he go to high school?

Ausubel: No, he obtained a high school correspondence course diploma. His family was very poor.... When his dad died when he was in the eighth grade he had to go to work in the mines.

He sold insurance. He actually played baseball — he was very athletic and he played ball for three different teams under three different names. Kind of a Baron Von Munchhausen character, very charismatic and had the manner of a used car salesman, but utterly sincere about his therapy.

And so as he opened his first clinic, word spread pretty quickly and he became rather famous rather fast. He was just south of Chicago in a place called Taylorsville. Word reached the AMA headquarters in Chicago, and he was invited to do this demonstration of his treatment. But then the mystery really kicks in because the accounts diverge radically.

Hoxsey said that the AMA called him into their office and offered him a contract for the rights of his formula. And he brought up the issues that his father had asked about treating poor people for free and maybe carrying the Hoxsey name and they frostily told him there would be no changes in the contract: sign it or else you'll be ruined. And he refused. The AMA denied of course that this ever happened. For the next thirty-five years they fought each other tooth and nail.

Toms: We probably at this point, should describe the Hoxsey method. It involves two types of medicine —

Ausubel: There is an internal tonic that you take orally and then there are these two salves. One is a powder and one is a paste. And the tonic is nine herbs in a base of potassium iodine. And it tastes kind of like flat root beer, it's not unpleasant at all.

And then the two salves,...called esoterics. They actually come from a shepherding tradition. The red paste is an indiscriminate caustic: it will eat anything in its path. It can be very, very dangerous in unskilled hands. And then the yellow powder is called selective. It will only harm malignant tissues. In other words, you could put it on your arm if you had some skin cancer and it would not affect the healthy tissue but would literally eat away the malignant tissue.

The external salves are not even contested anymore: they do work. Organized medicine in one of its battles with Hoxsey admitted that around 1950.

Toms: I know that Dr. James Duke — who used to be at the National Institute of Health and later at the Department of Agriculture — made a statement for your film and also in the book that all the ingredients of Hoxsey's tonic were ingredients that had been tested at NIH and had been proven anti-carcinogenic.

Ausubel: Yes, it's really fascinating because all these years Hoxsey's quest was for an investigation. Essentially at least seven of the nine herbs have shown anti-cancer and anti-tumor activity under controlled laboratory conditions. There is no question of this that these are anti-cancer plants.

Toms: So in the fifties, [Hoxsey] was going strong.

Ausubel: Right. There was a prosecutorial assault [throughout] the 1950s and amazingly, Hoxsey won almost every single trial. Then the story takes quite a Shakespearean twist. He discovered in 1967 that he had prostate cancer. And Hoxsey took his tonic but it didn't work for him.

His wife finally prevailed on him to go and have surgery but this was the very surgery that he had decried all these years, of course. Nobody knows exactly what happened but something went wrong in the surgery. For the last seven years of his life he was an invalid. Isolated, almost alone, people had forgotten about him and he died in 1974 without even an obituary in the Dallas newspapers.

Toms: So [he sent] his nurse friend...to Mexico.

Ausubel: Tijuana, in Mexico. And a federal government or government sponsored report has found "noteworthy instances of survival using the Hoxsey therapy." They are recommending investigation. So seventy-five years later, Hoxsey is getting what he wanted all along. [And now] the Office of Alternative Medicine budget has jumped from $2 million to $50 million in about four years. So you'll be seeing many, many more of these therapies starting to enter practices.

Toms: What are some of the other ones?

Ausubel: There's a very interesting one developed by a physician in Houston named Dr. Stanislav Berzinsky, [who] came up with this peptide theory that there are changes in the amino acids. The Food and Drug Administration went after him for fifteen years and they finally, finally lost the trial and Berzinsky won. He's now got seventy-five clinical trials going, and the early results are absolutely clear that he is curing certain kinds of cancer. That's one of the front runners. The Burton protocol is another amino-augmentative therapy that has shown some pretty good results.

None of these things is a magic bullet and none of them has claimed to be. Hoxsey never claimed to have a cure-all. He said he had his own opinion about his success rates and certain types of cancers that it is more or less effective against and we should test that because we should know. Also it should be emphasized that conventional cancer treatments do work for some kinds of cancers and some stages of cancer and patients should absolutely be advised of those therapies. [But] chemotherapy [is comprised of] brutally toxic drugs. You can actually die from the drugs. In the case of the Hoxsey tonic, the worst it's going to do to you is nothing but it won't hurt you.

Toms: One of the things that struck me, Kenny, in reading the book and seeing the film was that [Hoxsey's treatment] also has to do with patient's attitudes. Tell us about that.

Ausubel: Well, it's kind of remarkable because very early on, Hoxsey actually said that cancer is not only a disease, it's a psychosis and so he treated the whole person. He treated the mind and the spirit and the emotional body. In the 1920s,'30s,'40s, and'50s this was very radical.

At that same time, he recommended a diet, which in that era was also very radical because organized medicine said there is no connection between diet and health or diet and disease. So he was way ahead of his time on these things. And it becomes even harder to investigate these treatments in that way when you have a whole gestalt. So it makes it very complex when you try and look at these things scientifically.

Toms: So this leads us into the power of the patient.

Ausubel: I think that's the crux, really, of a lot of this stuff. It's entirely people-driven. They say that as many as two-thirds of cancer patients are now using an alternative therapy. There are bills before Congress now and eventually one of these is going to get passed that essentially demand access to medical treatment. That you as a patient in consultation with your physician have the right to make an informed choice and that's a very, very reasonable thing.

Toms: I remember when I used to talk to Andy Weil maybe ten, twelve years ago in the late eighties and there were something like two or three medical schools that had any kind of curriculum in complementary or alternative medicine at all. And now there are 119 or 122, something like that. That's going to create a whole other world.

Ausubel: Exactly. Education is so important to this process. What Andy talks about and other physicians talk about is integrative medicine, where you take the best of all worlds and as much as possible you base that on real evidence rather than the ideology of whichever side. That's certainly the future I would like to see, and I believe many patients would like to see that. After all, you want the maximum of good options that you can have and when you're facing a terminal illness you don't really care about ideology: you're interested in results.

Toms: Why wouldn't anyone want the best of all worlds?

Ausubel: I can't answer that. But George Soros, the currency trader, actually gave a speech and money to Columbia University recently, and he has suggested that medicine should be taken out of the market. That it should be a non-profit industry. Should we really be making money off human suffering? He says no, and I think it's worth thinking about.

Toms: So it sounds like there's a very hopeful future for having more choices and more possibilities actually integrated into the culture.

Ausubel: Well, there is. I, personally, am guardedly optimistic. But knowing the story that Hoxsey tells you have to remain a little bit sanguine about it, too.

Copyright 2001, New Dimensions Foundation. All Rights Reserved. This article was excerpted from a radio interview by Michael Toms, aired on the nationally syndicated public radio series, New Dimensions. If you would like a cassette tape of the complete one-hour interview, you may order program #2818, "Harry Hoxsey, Healer Before His Time with Kenny Ausubel" interviewed by Michael Toms by sending $9.95 plus $2.00 shipping and handling (add 7 percent sales tax in California) to: New Dimensions Tapes, P.O. Box 569, Ukiah, CA 95482-0569, or by calling 800-935-8273 or via the Web site.

Kenny Ausubel is an award winning author, investigative journalist and filmmaker specializing in health and the environment. He's also an environmental entrepreneur who founded Seeds of Change and the Bioneers Conference. He produced, wrote, and directed the acclaimed feature documentary film, Hoxsey: How Healing Becomes a Crime.

The above article copied with the intent of spreading awareness only from:http://www.consciouschoice.com/2001/cc1409/harryhoxsey1409.html

snowdrop
07-30-2007, 02:31 PM
i've been to the hoxey (bio-medical) clinic.
my very best friend had breast cancer so i took her there in mexico.

alas, it didn't save her life, but gave her quality of life for what she had left.
i met many exceptional people in the waiting room and kept some of those friendships going (yes, they got well!) thru the years (15 yrs now)

i would do it for myself if the need ever arose.

SchoolOfRAWk
07-30-2007, 02:41 PM
Wow, that is sooo cool!
I definitely would do it, too.
Thanks for posting!